n8n vs Make (2026): workflow automation compared
Self-hostable workflow engine with code nodes (n8n) vs polished cloud automation with a huge connector catalog (Make).
Last updated:
Overview
n8n and Make solve overlapping problems with different tradeoffs—this page helps you stress-test fit, not pick a universal winner.
Use the questionnaire to reflect constraints and priorities; verify vendor terms and regional availability before you commit.
Get my recommendation
Answer for how you work today — scoring is deterministic for this comparison.
Automation complexity
Volume & ops maturity
Learning curve tolerance
App coverage
Recommendation
n8n
Point spread: 20% — share of combined points
Near tie on points — use the comparison and your own constraints.
From your answers
- Simple automations are Zapier’s bread and butter for many teams.
- SMB-friendly simplicity often starts with Zapier.
- Ease-of-use favors Zapier for many business users.
- Both cover common SaaS — compare exact connectors you need.
More context
- Self-hosting, custom nodes, or code-heavy logic are central to your automation.
- You answered toward control and data residency over turnkey polish.
- Your platform team can operate workflow infra like any other service.
Scores
n8n
87/100
Make
85/100
Visual comparison
Normalized radar from structured scores (not personalized).
Automation touches credentials and PII—treat both as sensitive infrastructure. Review SOC reports, secrets handling, and least-privilege access for your stack.
Quick verdict
Choose n8n if…
- Data residency or self-hosting is mandatory for compliance.
- Your team wants code-level escape hatches inside workflows.
- You already run Kubernetes/VMs and can own uptime.
Choose Make if…
- You want the richest connector library with minimal engineering.
- You prefer paying for managed scale over hiring automation ops.
- Citizen integrators outnumber engineers in your org.
Comparison table
| Feature | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting model | Self-host or cloud; data stays in your boundary when self-hosted | Fully managed cloud—fastest for teams without ops capacity |
| Developer control | JavaScript/Code nodes and fair-code ethos reward engineers | Low-code first—great for builders who prefer visual modules |
| Connector breadth | Large community nodes; sometimes you wire HTTP yourself | Massive catalog of polished app modules out of the box |
| Ops burden | Self-host means upgrades, backups, and scaling are on you | Vendor handles uptime—less control, less ops |
| Pricing | Open core + cloud tiers; self-host shifts cost to infra time | Operations-based pricing—watch scenario volume spikes |
| Best when | You need on-prem data or heavy customization with code | You want the fastest path across hundreds of SaaS tools |
Best for…
Fastest path to value
Winner:Make
Make’s hosted modules usually connect SaaS apps fastest.
Scaling & depth
Winner:n8n
Complex branching with custom code often lands in n8n for technical teams.
Budget sensitivity
Winner:n8n
Self-hosted n8n can win TCO if you already amortize ops headcount.
What do people choose?
Community totals — you can vote once and change your mind anytime.
FAQ
- Is n8n or Make objectively better?
- Neither is universal. The better choice depends on constraints, team skills, compliance, and total cost of ownership.
- How often should I revisit this decision?
- Markets and product roadmaps move quickly—revisit when pricing, security posture, or your workflow materially changes.
Compare more
Airtable vs Smartsheet
Tools60% vs 62%
Airtable and Smartsheet target overlapping needs—pick based on constraints, not branding alone.
Asana vs Trello
Tools76% vs 76%
Structured team programs and reporting versus simple boards and cards—pick based on scale, governance, and how much structure you actually need.
Cal.com vs Calendly
Tools85% vs 85%
Open, self-hostable scheduling (Cal.com) vs the mainstream hosted default (Calendly)—ops appetite and enterprise polish decide.
ChatGPT vs Claude
Tools80% vs 78%
Broad consumer AI with plugins and ecosystem versus long-context, careful tone, and strong writing and analysis defaults.
ChatGPT vs Gemini
Tools78% vs 82%
OpenAI’s mainstream assistant versus Google’s model tied into Search, Workspace, and Android—pick by ecosystem and how you work.
ClickUp vs Asana
Tools78% vs 74%
All-in-one depth and configurability versus polished team coordination—both handle serious work; one leans feature-dense, the other workflow clarity.
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
RisingTools72% vs 78%
An AI-first editor with agentic workflows versus Copilot inside the IDE you already use—depth in one product vs ubiquity in many.
DeepSeek vs ChatGPT
RisingTools78% vs 80%
Competitive pricing and strong reasoning defaults versus the widest consumer ecosystem, integrations, and brand recognition.
Discord vs Slack
Tools82% vs 80%
Community voice + large servers (Discord) vs work-centric channels, search, and enterprise compliance (Slack)—overlap for small teams, different at scale.
Figma vs Canva
Tools76% vs 78%
Professional UI and design-system workflows versus fast marketing visuals and templates—overlap on graphics, different centers of gravity.
Figma vs Sketch
Tools75% vs 70%
Figma and Sketch target overlapping needs—pick based on constraints, not branding alone.
GitLab vs GitHub
Tools67% vs 63%
Integrated DevSecOps in one product (GitLab) vs the largest open-source collaboration hub with Copilot and Actions (GitHub).
Trending in this category
Cursor vs GitHub Copilot
RisingTools72% vs 78%
An AI-first editor with agentic workflows versus Copilot inside the IDE you already use—depth in one product vs ubiquity in many.
DeepSeek vs ChatGPT
RisingTools78% vs 80%
Competitive pricing and strong reasoning defaults versus the widest consumer ecosystem, integrations, and brand recognition.
Perplexity vs Google Search
Tools78% vs 78%
Answer-first research with citations versus the open web, ads, and infinite links—pick what matches how you verify facts.
GitLab vs GitHub
Tools67% vs 63%
Integrated DevSecOps in one product (GitLab) vs the largest open-source collaboration hub with Copilot and Actions (GitHub).
Notion vs Obsidian
Tools72% vs 74%
Hosted collaboration and databases versus local Markdown, plugins, and full control of your files.
Slack vs Microsoft Teams
Tools76% vs 74%
Channel culture and developer-friendly integrations versus Microsoft 365–native meetings, files, and IT standardization.