Settings

Theme

n8n vs Make (2026): workflow automation compared

Self-hostable workflow engine with code nodes (n8n) vs polished cloud automation with a huge connector catalog (Make).

Last updated:

Overview

n8n and Make solve overlapping problems with different tradeoffs—this page helps you stress-test fit, not pick a universal winner.

Use the questionnaire to reflect constraints and priorities; verify vendor terms and regional availability before you commit.

Get my recommendation

Answer for how you work today — scoring is deterministic for this comparison.

Automation complexity

Volume & ops maturity

Learning curve tolerance

App coverage

Recommendation

n8n

Point spread: 20% — share of combined points

Near tie on points — use the comparison and your own constraints.

From your answers

  • Simple automations are Zapier’s bread and butter for many teams.
  • SMB-friendly simplicity often starts with Zapier.
  • Ease-of-use favors Zapier for many business users.
  • Both cover common SaaS — compare exact connectors you need.

More context

  • Self-hosting, custom nodes, or code-heavy logic are central to your automation.
  • You answered toward control and data residency over turnkey polish.
  • Your platform team can operate workflow infra like any other service.

Scores

n8n

87/100

Make

85/100

Visual comparison

Normalized radar from structured scores (not personalized).

n8nMake

Automation touches credentials and PII—treat both as sensitive infrastructure. Review SOC reports, secrets handling, and least-privilege access for your stack.

Quick verdict

Choose n8n if…

  • Data residency or self-hosting is mandatory for compliance.
  • Your team wants code-level escape hatches inside workflows.
  • You already run Kubernetes/VMs and can own uptime.

Choose Make if…

  • You want the richest connector library with minimal engineering.
  • You prefer paying for managed scale over hiring automation ops.
  • Citizen integrators outnumber engineers in your org.

Comparison table

Featuren8nMake
Hosting modelSelf-host or cloud; data stays in your boundary when self-hostedFully managed cloud—fastest for teams without ops capacity
Developer controlJavaScript/Code nodes and fair-code ethos reward engineersLow-code first—great for builders who prefer visual modules
Connector breadthLarge community nodes; sometimes you wire HTTP yourselfMassive catalog of polished app modules out of the box
Ops burdenSelf-host means upgrades, backups, and scaling are on youVendor handles uptime—less control, less ops
PricingOpen core + cloud tiers; self-host shifts cost to infra timeOperations-based pricing—watch scenario volume spikes
Best whenYou need on-prem data or heavy customization with codeYou want the fastest path across hundreds of SaaS tools

Best for…

Fastest path to value

Winner:Make

Make’s hosted modules usually connect SaaS apps fastest.

Scaling & depth

Winner:n8n

Complex branching with custom code often lands in n8n for technical teams.

Budget sensitivity

Winner:n8n

Self-hosted n8n can win TCO if you already amortize ops headcount.

What do people choose?

Community totals — you can vote once and change your mind anytime.

FAQ

Is n8n or Make objectively better?
Neither is universal. The better choice depends on constraints, team skills, compliance, and total cost of ownership.
How often should I revisit this decision?
Markets and product roadmaps move quickly—revisit when pricing, security posture, or your workflow materially changes.

Share this page